Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Cyberbullying and digital dating a growing problems for teens

By Ben Barnes


There is a growing type of bullying and abuse among teens that was non-existent a decade ago that goes by the name of "cyberbullying."  This can include a variety of different bullying methods that all use today's technology such as cell phones, e-mail, texting, or social networking websites.

Most often, cyberbullying victims are subject to repeated threatening texts, harassing e-mails, or other cruel comments via the internet.  What most people don't realize is that the affects caused by this type of abuse are invisible to the human eye.  Although someone may be the victim of digital dating gone bad, there are rarely any physical injuries.  Many times cases go unnoticed because the victim doesn't think it's a big deal, or they are afraid to tell their parents from fear that their cell phones or laptops will be confiscated, experts say.

New studies performed by the Cyberbullying Research Center indicate that the number of teenagers involved in romantic relationships that use tech devices and social networking to abuse each other is on the rise.

According to CNN, "sexting" is another growing form of cyberbullying.  This is when racy photos of an individual are shared with unintended recipients.  This can be extremely embarrassing and humiliating for students like Allyson Pereira, who was a victim of sexting in middle school.  Now, Pereira is campaigning and speaking out against digital dating abuse and is even featured in the MTV documentary, "A Thin Line," which advocates for cyberbullying victims.

Another common practice among abusive teens include preventing their partner from using a certain gadget or website altogether.  Around 10 percent of teens claim their romantic partner restricted them from using a computer or cell phone, experts say.  Also, an abusive partner will sometimes take the password of their victim's e-mail or Facebook to routinely check up on him or her, says Parry Aftab, founder of the internet bullying advocacy group, Wired Safety.

Many times, cyberbullying can lead to other serious problems.  Physical fights can occur when a cyber bully wishes to finish a fight that started online, as was the case with parent Wilmecia Robinson and her two daughters.

"(My daughters have) been terrified.  I mean they can't even concentrate and do their work," said Robinson.

She claims that her daughters were harassed all semester by a bully until the student was arrested for bringing a knife and mace to school.  There have been approximately five other cyberbullying cases in the Metro school area responded to in the past two weeks, school officials say.  That's more than they have ever seen in that amount of time.

Officials said that most commonly, cases begin with threats or phrases such as:

  • Do you want to fight me?
  • You better leave my sister alone!
  • We'll settle this at school!

One of the worst parts of the cyberbullying pie is the fact that today's technology allows for the abusive partner to have constant access to the victim.  This means they can stalk the person when and where they want to, all the time.  Social networking can give a bully more leverage, thanks to the hundreds and thousands of students connected online, says Kevin Jennings, assistant deputy secretary of education for the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools.

Tyler Clementi
In the worst cases cyberbullying even leads to suicide, such as the tragic death of a Rutgers University freshman named Tyler Clementi.  After a live video of his sexual encounter with another man was streamed online to thousands of viewers, Clementi committed suicide by leaping off the George Washington Bridge.  This incident sparked an outrage among gay supporters, fellow students, and cyberbullying advocates alike.

This tragic case is just one example of the hundreds of thousands of cyberbullying cases here in the United States.  With more and more groups forming in the defense of digital dating victims, there is still hope for a halt to this new problem among teens.

Thursday, October 21, 2010

Pot legalization would show big savings for California

By Ben Barnes

If Prop19 is passed in California on November 2nd, the legalization of cannabis would help relieve some of the state's financial woes.  However, the bulk of the savings wouldn't be from tax revenue; rather from the money saved by law enforcement cuts, experts say.

It's been debated that taxing marijuana would could rescue the state from it's budget issues.  But the reality is, despite what many people think, the law change would not act as a financial cure-all, say top legalization advocates.

According to the Cato Institute in Washington D.C. most of the money added to California's revenue would be from budget cuts, or, job cuts.  The institution estimates that approximately $1.312 billion would be saved from the legalization of pot.  It's said that around $352 million would be from tax revenue, while the remaining $960 million would be from saved from law enforcement costs.

Jeffrey Miron, a senior fellow at the Cato Institution, said that most of the savings would be due to law enforcement cuts, including police officers, prison guards, judges, and prosecutors whose service would no longer be required.  These personnel cuts would damage the job market as well, at least initially, he said.

"I think that California is being somewhat optimistic in thinking that this is going to make a significant difference to its budget situation.  I think it won't do much for the economy," said Miron.

 If passed, Prop19 would not legalize cannabis statewide.  This means that local governments would have the power to either allow or prohibit the sale of marijuana, as well as to impose additional taxes and/or fees, on top of sales tax.

Some have a more optimistic outlook on the savings from tax revenue, such as National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, or NORML, director Dale Gieringer.  Although, it will be a long time before California sees any of those funds, he says.

Friday, October 1, 2010

Medical Marijuana no Longer a Misdemeanor in California

By Ben Barnes

Marijuana comes closer to absolute legalization yesterday as California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signs Senate Bill 1449, which reduces an adult possession of marijuana charge from a criminal misdemeanor to a civil infraction.

With the new law, adult possession of marijuana up to 28.5 grams remains a simple infraction.  This means that the worst punishment receivable is nothing more than a $100 fine.  That's right folks, no court appearances, no court fees, and no criminal record.  Also, the passage of this bill will significantly decrease the amount of state money directed towards the court.  This is because minor marijuana offenders will no longer be required to go to court.

A marijuana leaf.
This bill comes at the height of the national dispute of marijuana and its legalization.  There are countless arguments on either side of the debate, each harboring reasons supporting their belief.  Many states have different policies on marijuana, and California has always been known as a state with relaxed laws against the substance. Senate Bill 1449 has several significant benefits attached to it.

 These policies will still be in effect, even if Proposition 19 is passed by voters allowing the public use of cannabis; it would basically be treated and taxed the same as alcohol.  The deadline for voters
 is October 18. As for the current status of the vote; it's known that as many as 200 or more significant officials have already cast their "yes" to the vote, including law enforcement officers, physicians and doctors, economists and business leaders, elected officials, popular organizations, labor unions and faith leaders.

All in all, Governor Schwarzenegger has done a bold thing for the state of California; addressing a sensitive issue in a mannerly way.  With the new Senate Bill, state money will be saved and citizens will have even more allowance when it comes to the use of cannabis.

“Gov. Schwarzenegger deserves credit for sparing the state’s taxpayers the cost of prosecuting minor pot offenders,” said California NORML director Dale Gieringer, “Californians increasingly recognize that the war on marijuana is a waste of law enforcement resources.”